August 2018 // Volume 56 // Number 4 // Tools of the Trade // 4TOT4
Strategies for 4-H Program Planning and Recruitment Relative to African American Male Youths
Extension educators often seek new strategies for engaging minority youths in 4-H programs, especially young Black males. These strategies require programming developed in response to the context of this population. We offer insights into the social context of Black males and offer suggestions that will help educators develop identity and integrative site-based programs for this population.
Extension's 4-H youth development program area helps young people and families build skills for themselves and their communities. In addition, a responsibility integral to Extension's purpose is planning and disseminating programs based on community needs. Extension's foci have been on gaining a greater understanding of its audiences' histories and cultures, identifying relevant issues, and finding solutions to those issues (Hoorman, 2002). More recently, an overlying focus in Extension has been increasing the participation of urban minority youths in 4-H (Garcia, Piña, & Dromgoole, 2017).
Many youths in urban communities experience challenges and pressures similar to those of other youths as they progress through their adolescent years. However, youths in high-risk urban communities often also face significant social and economic challenges that affect their development and integration into society. Common issues include exposure to violence, minimal connections to community resources, limited social networks, and limited financial opportunities (Yarmuth et al., 2012).
Although sweeping assumptions cannot be made about all those who live in urban communities, research has shown that a large number of African Americans who reside in urban communities experience social and familial challenges. For example, a high percentage of Black youths live in single-parent households or those headed by older individuals such as grandparents (Belgrave & Brevard, 2015). Higher rates of familial challenges can lead to higher rates of crime (Williams, Auslander, Houston, Krebill, & Haire-Joshu, 2000), ultimately affecting family dynamics and community interactions.
Community and family contexts also influence physical and psychological health and well-being in urban African American communities. For example, increased levels of asthma and obesity are experienced in such communities (Belgrave & Brevard, 2015). Young Black males, in particular, face their own set of physical and psychological health challenges. In addition to bringing about typical changes, puberty affects young Black males much differently than it does other emerging adults due to sociological factors they face, such as familial challenges, discrimination, and racism (Belgrave & Brevard, 2015). Research has shown that at puberty young Black males, particularly those in urban areas, begin a series of transitions that include spending less time with family and more time with friends and losing interest in school (Belgrave & Brevard, 2015). Additionally, according to Neblett, Chavous, Nguyên, and Sellers (2009), youths faced with racial discrimination and stereotyping can feel helpless. Moreover, research has shown that racial discrimination in afterschool programs is often the reason for young African American males' low engagement, poor grades, and violent activity (Caldwell, Kohn-Wood, Schmeelk-Cone, Chavous, & Zimmerman, 2004; Neblett et al., 2009). Young Black males also may deal with substance abuse and the related consequences, which include exposure to the criminal justice system and educational problems (Belgrave & Brevard, 2015).
Although obstacles may be greater for young African American males, access to life skills through school teachers and administrators, major mentors, civic groups, and churches can reduce their impacts, especially as this group has indicated having greater levels of trust in the aforementioned groups (Harris & Taylor, 2012). Consequently, by gaining this group's trust, Extension may be able to make positive impacts on individuals and their communities through associated 4-H programming.
Lack of Black Male Participation in 4-H and Youth Development Programs
Some researchers (Cano & Bankston, 1992; Russell & Heck, 2008; Schinker, 2010) have explored factors associated with participation and nonparticipation of minority youths in 4-H youth development programs. Many programs have proved quite successful and had positive impacts on youth development; however, minority youths often are not represented by these statistics. Barriers such as family and financial constraints play a major role in low participation in afterschool programming by urban minority youths. Research also has suggested that although minority youths are willing to participate, barriers related to accessibility, location, and type of programs offered limit their involvement (Gardner, Roth, & Brooks-Gunn, 2009; Ingram & Syvertsen, 2005). Furthermore, Ward and Webster (2011) named identity development and self-esteem as factors that contribute to the lack of participation by minority youths.
Strategies for Engaging Young African American Males in 4-H Programming
Table 1 lists suggestions and planning tips 4-H programming staff will find useful for engaging young African American males. These suggestions are based on research with Black youths indicating that environmental and cultural forces shape the relationship between identity, particularly related to race and gender, and the inclusion of Black adolescent males (Bryan, Williams & Griffin, 2015). Although this list is by no means exhaustive, it can help those involved in 4-H understand how to better reach Black males via 4-H programs.
|Culturally relevant and inclusive programming|
|Cultural rites of passage||Incorporate cultural rites of passage activities and programming in 4-H programs for urban African American male youths to foster their learning more about their culture and race and the challenges facing them in today's society (Brittian & Williams, 2017).|
|Inclusivity and identity||Include more programming and models that address and adapt to African American male ethnic identity and racial pride (Crawley, 2018).|
|Male-focused perspective||Create father–son intervention leadership programs to address the lack of appropriate role models and increase in single-parent households (Woodland, 2016).|
|Social and wellness programming|
|Mentoring||Establish strong mentoring programs that can serve as catalysts for African American young male participation and foster deeper and more supportive relationships with adults (Watson, Sealey-Ruiz, & Jackson, 2016).|
|Health and wellness||Integrate programs that address stress management skills and strategies for dealing with racial discrimination (Jones & Neblett, 2016). Many of these programs can foster greater leadership and community service within 4-H clubs and among members.|
|Family- and community-focused programming|
|Religious pathways||Create partnerships and collaborations with church-based youth programs or mentoring programs. African American young males are involved in religious activities and feel a level of trust with church and community groups (Harris & Taylor, 2012); therefore, such partnerships may increase 4-H afterschool programming participation.|
|Collaboration with sports and recreational programs||Develop collaborations with sports and recreation programs for increasing involvement with young Black males in rural and urban communities (Bailey & Bradbury-Bailey, 2010). Establishing 4-H programs with existing sports programs not only may help increase participation but also may improve the perception of 4-H among these youths.|
|Inclusion of the entire family||Incorporate strategies to support the entire family within the program to enhance the growth and development of young African American males (Jones & Neblett, 2016). Inclusion of the entire African American family in 4-H programs, rather than only the caregiver, may increase participation in 4-H programming.|
|Extracurricular activity models||Integrate extracurricular activity models focusing on 4-H afterschool programming to benefit youths; consider including sports, academic assistance, computer technology, music, and creative arts (Zarrett, Abraczinskas, Skiles Cook, Wilson, & Ragaban, 2018).|
African American males' participation in youth development programs is a worthwhile investment for both individuals and communities. Young men who participate in 4-H programming have the opportunity to build self-esteem, create personal networks, and improve their outlooks on the future. Because of many social challenges faced by this group, 4-H educators must have a clear understanding of the group's realities and use that information to foster purposeful and meaningful inclusion in 4-H programs. To increase enrollment by this specific audience, Extension educators should consider integrating the tools described here into their 4-H programs.
Bailey, D., & Bradbury-Bailey, M. (2010). Empowered youth programs: Partnerships for enhancing postsecondary outcomes of African American adolescents. Professional School Counseling, 14(1), 64–74.
Belgrave, F. Z., & Brevard, J. K. (2015). Introduction: Contextual and theoretical framework. In F. Z. Belgrave & J. K. Brevard (Eds.), African American boys identity, culture, and development (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Springer.
Brittian Loyd, A., & Williams, B. V. (2017). The potential for youth programs to promote African American youth's development of ethnic and racial identity. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 29–38.
Bryan, J., Williams, J., & Griffin, D. (2015). Closing opportunity gaps for Black male students though school-family-community partnerships. In M. S. Henfield & A. R. Washington (Eds.) School counseling for Black male student success in 21st century urban schools (pp. 75–98). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Caldwell, C. H., Kohn-Wood, L. P., Schmeelk-Cone, K. H., Chavous, T. M., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Racial discrimination and racial identity as risk or protective factors for violent behaviors in African American young adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 91–105.
Cano, J., & Bankston, J. (1992). Factors which influence participation and non-participation of ethnic minority youth in Ohio 4-H programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 33(1), 23–29.
Crawley, B. H. (2018). Effective programs and services for African American families and children: An African-centered perspective. In B. H. Crawley (Ed.), The black family strengths, self-help, and positive change (pp. 112–130). New York, NY: Routledge.
Garcia, M., Piña, M., & Dromgoole. D. (2017). Including at-risk populations in urban 4-H afterschool programs. Journal of Medical Diagnosis Methods, 6(252). Retrieved from https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/including-atrisk-populations-in-urban-4h-afterschool-programs-2572-9462-1000252.php?aid=92939
Gardner, M., Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2009). Can after-school programs help level the academic playing field for disadvantaged youth? Equity Matters: Research Review No. 4. Retrieved from http://www.equitycampaign.org/i/a/document/11242_After-school_report_10-7-09_web.pdf
Harris, T., & Taylor, G. (2012). Raising African American males: Strategies and interventions for successful outcomes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hoorman, J. (2002). Engaging minority and culturally diverse audiences. Journal of Extension, 40(6), Article 6TOT2. Available at: https://www.joe.org/joe/2002december/tt2.php
Ingram, P., & Syvertsen, A. (2005). Hearing their needs: Voices of underrepresented populations. Journal of Extension, 43(5), Article 5FEA1. Available at: https://www.joe.org/joe/2005october/a1.php
Jones, S. C., & Neblett, E. W. (2016). Racial–ethnic protective factors and mechanisms in psychosocial prevention and intervention programs for Black youth. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19(2), 134–161.
Neblett, E. W., Chavous, T. M., Nguyên, H. X., & Sellers, R. M. (2009). "Say it loud—I'm Black and I'm proud": Parents' messages about race, racial discrimination, and academic achievement in African American boys. The Journal of Negro Education, 78(3), 246–259.
Russell, S., & Heck, K. (2008). Middle school dropout? Enrollment trends in the California 4-H youth development program. Applied Developmental Science, 12(1), 1–9.
Schinker, R. (2010). 4-H leaders: Factors that affect their persistence in the 4-H youth development program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Paper 624. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/624
Ward, S., & Webster, N. (2011). Cultural relevance and working with inner city youth populations to achieve civic engagement. Journal of Extension, 49(5), Article 5TOT5. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2011october/tt5.php
Watson, W., Sealey-Ruiz, Y., & Jackson, I. (2016). Daring to care: The role of culturally relevant care in mentoring Black and Latino male high school students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(5), 980–1002.
Williams, J. H., Auslander, W. F., Houston, C. A., Krebill, H., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2000). African American family structure: Are there differences in social, psychological, and economic well-being? Journal of Family Issues, 21(7), 838–857. doi:10.1177/019251300021007002
Woodland, M. H. (2016). After-school programs: A resource for young Black males and other urban youth. Urban Education, 51(7), 770–796.
Yarmuth, M., Patterson, J., Burton, T., Douglas, C., Taylor, T., & Boyle, M. (2012). Using research to understand youth in high-risk urban communities. Social Marketing Quarterly, 18(3), 187–202.
Zarrett, N., Abraczinskas, M., Skiles Cook, B., Wilson, D. K., & Ragaban, F. (2018). Promoting physical activity within under-resourced afterschool programs: A qualitative investigation of staff experiences and motivational strategies for engaging youth. Applied Developmental Science, 22(1), 58–73.