![]() |
December 2003
|
| |
Using Social Marketing to Plan a Nutrition Education Program Targeting TeensGwenn Snow Jamie Benedict Department of Nutrition IntroductionNational food intake data indicate that many children between the ages of 12 and 19 years consume too few servings of nutrient-dense foods such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and dairy foods. But they consume more servings than recommended of foods high in fats, sodium, and sugars (Kennedy & Goldberg, 1995; Mønoz, Krebs-Smith, Ballard-Barbash, & Cleveland, 1997; US Department of Agriculture, 1999). These dietary patterns place many of these children at risk for inadequate intake of important nutrients; excessive intake of total and saturated fats, sodium, and sugars; and increased risk of chronic disease. Given the depth of these nutritional concerns, large-scale interventions targeting teens are warranted. However, targeted interventions require extensive knowledge about the intended audience (Sutton, Balch, & Lefebvre, 1995; Sutton, Layden, & Haven, 1996). In a process termed "social marketing," public health practitioners use strategies developed by commercial marketers to better understand the wants and needs of intended recipients of health promotion programs (Andreason, 1995; Kotler & Zaltman, 1971; Lefebvre & Flora, 1988). PurposeThis article describes how social marketing was used to plan a nutrition education program for teens in Nevada to increase their consumption of nutrient-dense foods, including fruits and vegetables, low-fat dairy foods, and whole grains. The content is specific to nutrition education and Nevada youth, but the concepts are applicable to a broad range of health behaviors and social conditions and have relevance for Extension educators of any discipline. Social MarketingSocial marketing is a process by which commercial marketing techniques and principals are used to plan, implement, and evaluate programs designed to bring about change in health or social behaviors. In this study, two concepts from social marketing were emphasized: the exchange theory and the Four Ps of marketing, product, price, place, and promotion (4Ps). The exchange theory proposes that true marketing occurs when the provider and consumer voluntarily trade (or exchange) resources (Andreason, 1995; Kotler & Zaltman, 1971; Lefebvre & Flora, 1988). See Figure 1 for brief definitions of and questions related to each of the Four Ps (Siegel & Doner, 1998, p. 216). Figure 1.
MethodsUsing standard practices (Krueger, 1994; Vaughn, Schumm, & Sinagub, 1996), focus group interviews were conducted with middle school students to obtain descriptive information related to the following.
Volunteers were recruited from students in sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade physical education classes in two low-income middle schools. Seven focus groups, segmented by grade level and gender, were conducted. Thirty-four students (17 girls), ranging in age from 11-14 years (Mean age = 12.38 years, SD = 0.89), took part. Two adults, a moderator and a co-moderator, were present for all discussions. A team that included Extension nutrition specialists developed a discussion guide (see Figure 2), which the moderator used for all of the discussions. Figure 2.
Each focus group took place at school, lasted about 55 minutes, and was audiotaped in full. Using typewritten transcripts of the discussions, the data were codified and categorized, according to the process described by Vaughn, Schumm, and Sinagub (1996, p. 105-109). Summary of Findings and Discussion of Related ResearchQuestions applying the Four Ps of Marketing, Product, Price, Place, and Promotion, to social programs (Figure 1) were used to summarize these results. When relevant, related research findings are included. Please note: Phrases in quotation marks were taken directly from the transcripts. Product Product-related information obtained during the discussions included descriptions of participants' wants/needs, benefits of consuming nutrient-dense foods/beverages, and competitors for the desired behavior change. Wants/needs and perceived benefits of the behavior change fit into the following three categories.
These findings highlight the importance of taste enjoyment, convenience/ease of preparation, and familiarity in determining food choices among teens and demonstrate how difficult it is for teens to describe the benefits of healthful eating. These results are similar to those reported elsewhere (Neumark-Sztainer, Story, Perry, & Casey, 1999; Croll, Neumark-Sztainer, & Story, 2001). When asked what made it harder for them to consume nutrient-dense foods/beverages, participants often named other foods/beverages (or competitors) such as sodas, candies, chips, "sweets," and "junk foods." Data from national food consumption surveys support these findings (Harnack, Stang, & Story, 1999; Mønoz, Krebs-Smith, Ballard-Barbash, & Cleveland, 1997). Price Participants associated the following costs with the behavior change:
Given the paucity of meaningful benefits and the number of costs associated with nutrient-dense foods, it is unlikely that target audience members perceived the cost to be a fair exchange for the benefit associated with the behavior change. Participants in this study provided specific, practical suggestions for minimizing costs; these strategies were similar to those described by Neumark-Sztainer et al. (1999).
Place Place addresses issues related to access, or where and how target audience members can acquire the product or perform the behavior. Participants' perceptions about place included the belief that their food choices were limited to what others, especially parents and cafeteria workers, purchased, prepared, and served to them. Similarly, Neumark-Sztainer et al. (1999) found that parental food purchasing and preparation behaviors affected food availability and, consequently, food choices among adolescents. Other perceptions indicated that participants believed that nutrient-dense foods/beverages were rarely (if ever) available where/when they obtained or consumed snacks or meals. Croll et al. (2001) reported that adolescents perceived that "healthy" foods were less available than "unhealthy" foods. Two strategies for reducing place-related barriers predominated:
A third suggestion, found here and reported in Neumark-Sztainer et al. (1999), was to limit access to competitors as a means to increase consumption of nutrient-dense foods. Promotion To determine the best way to reach the target audience, it was necessary to obtain information about their level of interest in the topic and their communication preferences, including image and tone of messages and delivery channels and methods. Related to the current demand for the behavior change among members of the target audience, findings reported here and elsewhere indicate that demand for nutrient-dense foods is low among pre-teens/teens (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 1999; Croll et al., 2001). Participants clearly preferred good-tasting foods/beverages that are visually appealing, familiar to them, readily available, and convenient. More important, they rarely associated these characteristics with nutrient-dense foods. To gather information about message image and tone, participants were asked to describe their favorite advertisements. They enthusiastically described commercials that included slapstick humor, an element of surprise, gross exaggerations of everyday occurrences, or plays on words and that made adults look foolish. Potential topics of interest emerged when participants were asked "If you were going to make a nutrition program for other teens, what would it be about?" Mainly, they wanted to know how specific foods and nutrients affected their bodies. Examples included "tell us what good it would do in our bodies" and "show us what happens in the bodies of people who eat junk foods." Some participants expressed an interest in learning about foods from different cultures, and others wanted to know about unfamiliar foods: "if it tastes good." Occasionally a participant said, "just tell us what to eat and what not to eat," but these comments garnered little support from others. For potential delivery channels, posters, television advertisements, and computers (both games and the Internet) were mentioned the most often, but computer games, music videos, sequential billboards, television cooking shows, and radio contests were mentioned with the most enthusiasm. Unexpectedly, participants specifically referred to the Food Guide Pyramid and Nutrition Facts Panel on food packages (especially cereal boxes). Other channels were identified when participants were asked to name good sources of nutrition information. Two distinct groups emerged from their responses: 1) people present in their daily lives, including parents (both mothers and fathers), older siblings, and school personnel, especially classroom teachers, and librarians; and 2) people with food or nutrition-related knowledge or experience, such as food manufacturers, cafeteria workers, and health professionals. As for methods/activities, participants were the most enthusiastic about hands-on activities with foods, including food sampling, practical exercises using nutrition information, and food or nutrition-related experiments. Participants, especially the girls, also described activities that involved other people, such as peer or family education programs, guest speakers in the classroom, and school clubs. Although it was clear that hands-on and interpersonal activities were the preferred methods, some participants indicated they would enjoy learning by direct observation via classroom demonstrations, school assemblies, and plays. Participants identified a variety of settings and locations they thought were appropriate venues for nutrition education. School was mentioned the most often, and specific locations included cafeterias, libraries, nurses' offices, classrooms, after-school programs, and walking routes to and from school. Also mentioned were community centers such as parks, gyms, swimming pools, public libraries, and Boys and Girls Clubs; retail/commercial outlets such as grocery and convenience stores, malls, and movie theatres; and public agencies, including health centers/clinics. Developing a Social Marketing StrategyThe next step in the social marketing process is to develop a marketing plan for the stated objective, which in this case was to increase consumption of nutrient-dense foods among teens in Nevada. The following section begins with an overview of the strategic planning process and concludes with a strategy statement. Product Strategy Target calcium-containing foods/beverages because of the following product-related factors.
Pricing Strategy
Placement Strategy
Promotional Strategy Messages
Materials/Media
Teaching Activities/Methods
Strategy Statement Increase consumption of low-fat, calcium-containing foods/beverages among middle school students by changing their perceptions of the cost-to-benefit ratio of the behavior. Use popular media and sampling opportunities to enhance their familiarity with the product. Implement a school-based nutrition education program to increase their awareness of the importance of the behavior change, and provide them with the skills needed to perform the behavior. Use school personnel and parents to deliver messages. Implications for PracticeThis article illustrates how social marketing was used to gather and assess information for planning a nutrition education program targeting teens. However, social marketing is a useful tool for changing a broad range of health, social, and environmental behaviors. In addition, the process can be adapted for any target audience, whether these include a community's most needy or the individuals who serve them. This flexibility makes social marketing an ideal tool for Extension educators. Extension educators, by incorporating social marketing into their needs assessment activities, can avail themselves of a practical means for considering multiple influences on behaviors and for systematically factoring these into the decision-making process. By using social marketing to plan programs, Extension educators can be assured that they are addressing the needs of program recipients and using the best methods for communicating with and/or educating program recipients about the desired behavior change--thereby increasing the likelihood that their programs will be successful. Acknowledgements Funding was provided by the USDA, Food and Nutrition Services, Food Stamp Program. This study is based on unpublished thesis research. A portion of this study was presented at the Society for Nutrition Education 1999 Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD. ReferencesAndreason, A. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Washington DC: Jossey-Bass. Croll, J. K., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Story, M. (2001). Healthy eating: What does it mean to adolescents? Journal of Nutrition Education, 33(4), 193-198. Harnack, L., Stang, J., & Story, M. (1999). Soft drink consumption among US children and adolescents: Nutritional consequences. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(4), 436-441. Kennedy, E., & Goldberg, J. (1995). What are American children eating? Implications for public policy. Nutrition Reviews, 53, 111-126. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Lefebvre, R. C., & Flora, J. A. (1988). Social marketing and public health intervention. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 299-315. Mønoz, K. A., Krebs-Smith, S. M., Ballard-Barbash, R., & Cleveland, L. E.. (1997). Food intakes of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. Pediatrics, 100, 232-329. Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., Perry, C., & Casey, M. A. (1999). Factors influencing food choices of adolescents: Findings from focus-group discussions with adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(8), 929-937. Siegel, M., & Doner, L. (1998). Marketing public health: Strategies to promote social change. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc. Sutton, S. M., Balch, G. I., & Lefebvre, R. C. (1995). Strategic questions for consumer-based health communications. Public Health Reports, 110, 725-733. Sutton, S. M., Layden, W., & Haven, J. (1996). Dietary guidance and nutrition promotion: USDA's renewed vision of nutrition education. Family Economics and Nutrition Review, 14-21. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. (1999). Food and nutrient intakes by children 1994-96, 1998. Retrieved December 21, 2000 from http://www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/Products.html This article is online at http://www.joe.org/joe/2003december/a4.shtml. Copyright © by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315. Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in electronic or print form for use in educational or training activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications, electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be done only with prior electronic or written permission of the Journal Editorial Office, joe-ed@joe.org. If you have difficulties viewing or printing this page, please contact JOE Technical Support. |