![]() |
December 2001 Volume 39 Number 6 |
Hispanic American VolunteeringJosué López
Dept. of Agricultural and Extension Education The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania Internet Address: jxl400@psu.edu R. Dale Safrit
Associate Professor Dept. of Human and Community Resource Development The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio Internet Address: safrit.1@osu.edu IntroductionThe United States is a country where giving and volunteering is a pervasive characteristic of the total society (O'Connell & O'Connell, 1989). A study conducted in five central Ohio cities indicated that the typical adult volunteer was white and both middle-aged and middle-class (Safrit, King, & Burscu, 1994). According to Peterson et al. (1992), many of the critical issues facing contemporary urban communities directly affect non-white, limited resource, and both younger and older adult populations. Therefore, volunteer agencies and organizations are encouraged to make concerted efforts to identify and locate individuals within these population segments for targeted recruitment as program volunteers. The 2000 census recorded a total 35.3 million people under the designation Hispanic (U. S. Bureau of the Census, 2000). Although Hispanics live in every state, California, Texas, and New York have the largest concentrations, followed by Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, Arizona, and Colorado (Longres, 1995). According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census (2000), Ohio has a total of 217,123 Hispanic residents, and the largest concentrations live in Cuyahoga, Lucas, and Lorain counties. Fisher and Cole (1993) suggested that despite Hispanic Americans' long traditions of involvement in volunteer groups, including trade and professional associations, and women's and men's clubs and unions, their numbers are underrepresented in contemporary volunteer programs. "Mainstream volunteer programs have not reached out sufficiently to include as diverse a volunteer pool as possible" to accommodate cultural differences in such programs (Ellis & Noyes, 1990, p. 361). Similarly, Gallegos and O'Neil (1991), recommended that in this era of rising needs and limited resources Hispanics' talents should be mobilized through the aggressive recruitment, training, and stimulation of volunteers. Even with the increasing emphasis on, attention to, and valuing of cultural diversity in Cooperative Extension organizations during the past decade (Buck, 1997; Ewert & Rice, 1994; Gear, 1992; Ludwig, 1995; Williams, 1992), non-Anglo volunteers are still a largely invisible minority in Extension programs. Hobbs (2000) suggested that in order to effectively and efficiently target and engage volunteers from the Latino community, volunteer programs must find ways to build relationships with and establish trust within the community. However, even more fundamental research and insights are needed into the motivations of Hispanic Americans who actively contribute their personal leadership skills and abilities as volunteers. The purpose of the study reported here was to identify the attitudes, motivations, and barriers of Hispanic Americans toward participating in volunteer programs in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. MethodologyResearch Design This study used a qualitative methodology to portray potential patterns of volunteerism among Hispanic Americans. Qualitative methods are especially useful in the generation of categories for understanding human phenomena and for the investigation of the interpretation and meaning that people give to events they experience (Polkinghorne, 1991). According to Miles and Huberman (1994), qualitative data are a source of well-grounded, rich descriptions and explanations of processes in identifiable local context. Population The researchers identified 20 residents of the Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Hispanic American community to participate in the study. Lincoln and Guba (1985) agreed that a naturalistic qualitative design is more likely to favor purposive "sampling" because the participant thereby increases the scope of range of data exposed as well as the likelihood that the full array of multiple realities will be uncovered. Eight males and 12 females participated in the interviews. They ranged in age from 20 to 70 years. Instrumentation The researchers developed an interview schedule consisting of 15 open-ended questions with appropriate probes. The schedule focused on the following six categories:
The questionnaire was written in Spanish, translated into English, and back-translated into Spanish in order to establish its validity, and for analysis purposes. Data Collection and Analysis Face-to-face interviews were conducted in Spanish and tape- recorded with the participants' knowledge and consent. Following the interviews' transcription and translation into English, the tapes were destroyed to preserve the participants' confidentiality. Interviews averaged 30 minutes. The researchers analyzed the study data using the inductive, constant comparative method (multiple raters) described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) to identify reoccurring themes from the study data. This method uses two essential processes (unitizing and categorizing) and the continual revision, modification, and amendment until all new units can be placed into an appropriate category and the inclusion of addition units into categories provides no new information. Three professionals familiar with either volunteerism and/or Hispanic American culture served as raters and carefully read each transcribed interview. They submitted identified themes to the researchers, who collapsed the respective themes into overarching themes and resubmitted them to the raters. The raters reviewed the researchers' collapsed themes and suggested revisions based upon their individual original ideas. The process was repeated twice until both raters and researchers agreed upon the resulting themes unanimously. The researchers also calculated frequencies and percentages to better investigate the occurrence of individual issues within the overarching themes. ResultsThe six major recurring themes (and the issues that formed the focus of each theme) identified from the data are shown in Tables 1 to 5. Participant opinions and quotations important to the interpretation of a theme are included after each table. Theme 1. The Influence of Family and Friends on Volunteering Table 1
Theme 1. The Influence of Family and Friends on Volunteering
Theme 2. The Importance of Volunteering to Benefit Youth No related issues emerged.
Theme 3. The Importance of Church and Religious Beliefs in Volunteering Table 2
Theme 3. The Importance of Church and Religious Beliefs in Volunteering
Theme 4. Volunteering as a Requirement of Employment or Education Table 3
Theme 4. Volunteering as a Requirement of Employment or Education
Theme 5. The Connections Between Volunteering and the Community Table 4
Theme 5. The Connections Between Volunteering and the Community
Theme 6. Personal Satisfaction and Growth Experienced Through Volunteerism Table 5
Theme 6. Personal Satisfaction and Growth Experienced Through Volunteerism
ConclusionsBased upon the findings, the researchers suggest the following conclusions for Hispanic Americans in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, as supported by the authors identified.
Implications and Recommendations
ReferencesChambre, S. M. (1982). Recruiting Black and Hispanic volunteers: A qualitative study of organizations' experiences. Journal of Volunteer Administration, Fall, 3-9. Ellis, S. J., & Noyes, K. H. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Fisher, J. C., & Cole, K. M. (1993). Leadership and management of volunteer programs: A guide for volunteer administrators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Gallegos, H., & O'Neil, M. (1991). Hispanics and the nonprofit sector. New York. The Foundation Center. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine/Atherton. Hobbs, B. B. (2000, March). Recruiting and supporting Latino volunteers(EM 8754). Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service. Kennedy, E. M. (1991). National service and education for citizenship. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(10), 771,773. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Longres, J. (1995). Hispanics overview. In Encyclopedia of social work(19th ed., Vol. 1-3). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Nestor, N. L. (1984). Hispanic Americans: Tapping a new volunteer market. Voluntary Action Leadership, 3, 19-24. O'Connell, B., & O'Connell, A. B. (1989). Volunteers in action. New York: Foundation Center. Peterson, G. E., & others. (1992). Confronting the nation's urban crisis: From Watts (1965) to South Central Los Angeles (1992). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. (ERIC No. ED 359310). Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Two conflicting calls for methodology reform. Counseling Psychologist, 19(1), 103-104. Safrit, R. D., & Merrill, M. (2000). Personal capacities for volunteer administrators: Drawing upon the past as we move into the future. Journal of Volunteer Administration, XVII (4) & XVIII (1), 28-43. Safrit, R. D., King, J. E., & Burscu, K. (1993). A study of volunteerism in Ohio cities and surrounding communities: Final Report. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural Education. Swenson, C. A. (1990). How to speak to Hispanics. American Demographics, 22(2), 40-41. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. This article is online at http://joe.org/joe/2001december/rb2.html.
Copyright © by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315. Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in electronic or print form for use in educational or training activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications, electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be done only with prior electronic or written permission of the Journal Editorial Office, joe-ed@joe.org. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||