|
The First Fifty Years of the 4-H Program
(Part 1)
Beth E. Van Horn
County Extension Director/Family Living Agent
Pennsylvania State Cooperative Extension of Centre County
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania
Internet address: Beth1@psu.edu
Constance A. Flanagan
Associate Professor
Joan S. Thomson
Associate Professor
Department of Agricultural and Extension Education
Pennsylvania State University
State College, Pennsylvania
Digging into the roots of the 4-H program reveals how the
organization has both remained the same, but also changed during
the past 80 years. Studying our roots, and reminiscing about the
successes and failures of the last 80 years, can be informative
while providing valuable insights that can be used for developing
future programs and strategic or action plans.
In the early days, Extension educators conceived the idea of
involving youth as mediaries between the university
researcher/educator and the farmer in the community. This proved
successful because, in the early 1900s, corn clubs were
established, educators found youth to be more receptive than
their parents in adopting new corn planting techniques. Through
the young peoples' involvement and accomplishments in the corn
clubs, the parents were exposed to new farming methods and were
convinced to try and adopt new practices (Rasmussen, 1989;
Reyburn, 1980).
Club work has been the foundation of the 4-H program. School
programs have also been a fundamental model (Epsilon Sigma Phi,
1979). Along with the classic club and school programs, a range
of activities such as public speaking, camping, and judging
events have been developed, providing 4-H'ers with opportunities
to practice and apply new knowledge and ideas. As the youth
program grew and developed, the 4-H mission and purpose became
more defined. The 4-H emblem, pledge and motto focused at that
time as well as today on the development and growth of the
individual through (a) intellectual experiences, (b) compassion
and caring about the community, (c) learning and applying new
skills, and (d) living a healthy lifestyle.
The use of project clubs is still an effective way to reach
youth. Project clubs allow 4-H'ers the flexibility and freedom to
explore specific areas of interest within a general topic. Many
projects have been designed so 4-H'ers can build and enhance
their skills over several years. For example, clothing and
textile science projects start with the construction of simple
garments, mastering basic skills through the construction of a
pillow, simple pants, or skirt. A variety of projects are offered
that require more advanced skills, such as tailoring suits and
coats, allowing the 4-Her to explore areas related to clothing
and textile science such as career opportunities in costume
design or to develop life skills such as consumer decision-
making.
Many project clubs or community clubs (a club with more than
one project area) also provide youth with opportunities to learn
about forming organizations and decision-making groups, skills
that prepare them for adult roles in leadership and decision
making. Clubs often elect officers and committee chairs. Using
elected officers allows youth the opportunity to learn and apply
various life skills such as communication and leadership. Club
members learn how to negotiate decisions such as participating in
a fund raising event or taking a bus trip.
Many of the early clubs were co-ed, but sometimes membership
in clubs self-selected along gender lines. In contrast to youth
organizations such as Boy and Girl Scouts, which were gender
segregated by the organizational leadership, gender segregation
in 4-H only occurred as a result of children's selection of
projects. For example, corn clubs were generally more popular
with boys and canning clubs were popular with girls (Rasmussen,
1989).
The practice of having volunteers lead 4-H clubs was
established at the beginning and continues today. Training
volunteers is one reason leadership development has become an
integral part of the 4-H program. Initially, adults were neither
certified nor screened. Communities were small and intimate.
Community members trusted these leaders to be good models for
their children. Farm women and men, trained by county Extension
agents, acted as volunteer leaders in the early clubs. Usually
leaders assumed a mentoring role, rather than serving as a
authoritarian figure. Many of today's leaders are members of the
third and fourth generation of original Extension families. This
intergenerational continuity demonstrates the success of the
leadership development components of the program as well as the
commitment and loyalty that 4-H instills in its membership.
Throughout history, camping held an important role in 4-H.
Initially it was seen as a means of rewarding and encouraging
junior leaders. Documentation dated 1907 tells of a camp for boys
held that year in Missouri (Rasmussen, 1989). Thereafter, several
states began holding camps, with West Virginia leading the way in
formalizing camping as part of 4-H. By 1921, West Virginia had
established a permanent campsite that is still used. The
informality of the camping program and the companionship
opportunities it provides are considered the bases for its
popularity. Camping also offers many opportunities for young
people to develop leadership skills beyond the club environment
by working with youth from different communities and tackling
issues such as motivation, team building, and interpersonal
relationships.
Another method employed very early in 4-H's development was
the establishment of the school program. Historical documents
indicate that 4-H school programs for boys and girls were
organized early in the 1900s (Epsilon Sigma Phi, 1979; Vines &
Anderson, 1976). School programs tend to be more structured and
uniform than project clubs making it easier to work with large
groups of youth. Their purpose is typically to communicate
information or provide specific learning objectives. School
programs can be very effective in some program areas, such as
nutrition education, embryology, and teaching life skills such as
being safe when home alone. Advantages of school programs include
(a) easier access to the youth since they are already enrolled at
school; (b) greater diversity among participants; and (c) larger
numbers of youth, who for various reasons, would not belong to a
project club.
Both governmental and private funding have been used to
support the 4-H program. Although the youth program has been a
part of the Cooperative Extension system since its origin, it
wasn't until 1928 that a law was passed which formally recognized
the 4-H program and enhanced its funding. Although the goal was
to acquire $6 million, the Capper-Ketchum Act provided $1.28
million additional funding to Extension for 4-H.
Even with governmental support, there has always been a need
to augment funding through private support. The National 4-H
Service committee (originally called the National Committee on
Boys and Girls Club Work), located in Chicago, was formed in 1921
to establish scholarships and awards programs and conduct
National 4-H Congress, first held in 1922 (Vines & Anderson,
1976). Dual support between private and public sources continues
today and opportunities are continuously explored to find more
funds to expand and enhance programming.
Perhaps the most dramatic example of how 4-H changed in
response to social and historical events is reflected in its
response to the world wars. An examination of 4-H during the war
years reveals two things. First, the organization was able to
meet a national challenge in a short period of time. Second, the
organizational response resulted in excellent public relations as
well as an exponential increase in membership. During World War
I, 4-H Club work was partially abandoned and the energy of the
members was devoted to raising food as part of the war effort.
Many temporary county agents were hired, resulting in a rapid
increase in the number of 4-H clubs and members. At the end of
the war, more than one million 4-H club members were enrolled
Kelsey & Hearne, 1963).
During War World II, the 4-H program again focused on
raising Victory Gardens. 4-H members also grew essential war
crops, raised meat animals, and canned millions of jars of
fruits, vegetables, and meats. The 4-H war slogan was "Food for
Freedom." With the military and defense industries draining older
youth from the farm, younger 4-H members took on added
responsibilities. In nearly every project category, 4-H'ers
recorded impressive increases in levels of agricultural
production over the previous year.
Thus, 4-H members helped relieve the labor shortage, served
as neighborhood leaders, and assisted in war related activities.
It was estimated that from 1943 until the end of the war, 4-H
club members produced enough food to feed a million men serving
in the American forces (Rasmussen, 1989). At the end of the war,
4-H enrollment once again saw a large increase, reaching a total
of 1.5 million. The performance, achievements, and contributions
of 4-H'ers during the war is quite possibly the proudest moment
among many such moments in the history and development of the 4-H
program.
As we focus on our future we need to remember the
accomplishments of 4-H over the past 80 years. History shows that
4-H has been an important resource to the country, especially
during tough times. It also shows that we have managed to be true
to the original mission while changing our programs to meet new
challenges that young people and the nation face. In so doing, 4-
H has managed to focus on youth as resources to their community,
nation, and world.
References
Epsilon Sigma Phi, (1979). The people and the profession.
Kelsey, L. & Hearne, C. (Eds.). (1963). Cooperative
Extension Work. Ithica, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.
Rasmussen, W. (1989). Taking the university to the people:
Seventy-five Years of Cooperative Extension. Ames: Iowa State
University Press.
Reyburn, J. H. (1980). 4-H in Pennsylvania. University Park,
PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
Vines, C., & Anderson, M. (Eds.). (1976). Heritage Horizons,
Extension's commitment to people. Madison, WI: Journal of
Extension.
This article is online at
http://www.joe.org/joe/1998december/comm2.html.
Copyright ©
by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315.
Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the
Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in
electronic or print form for use in educational or training
activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications,
electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be
done only with prior electronic or written permission of the
Journal Editorial Office,
joe-ed@joe.org.
|