|
Programming Parameters for
5-to-8-Year-Old Children in 4-H
Scott D. Scheer
Assistant Professor
Department of Agricultural Education and
Extension Specialist, 4-H Youth Development
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio
Internet address: sscheer@pop.service.ohio-state.edu
Many states today have started 4-H programming for five to
eight year-olds, often called "Cloverbuds," "Cloverkids," or "4-H
Prep." After communicating with other state specialists, it was
evident that practical guidelines were needed in Ohio for
Extension programming with young children. This need to develop
clear, research-based information has led to the development of
10 fundamental parameters based upon preadolescents' needs as
well as educational design research. A literature review of
empirical research was conducted for developing these parameters.
The purpose of the 10 parameters is to help 4-H Extension
professionals make decisions regarding developmentally age-
appropriate programming. The parameters are consistent with the K
-3 Youth in 4-H: Guidelines for Programming (National 5-8
Curriculum Task Force, 1991) and the National Association for the
Education of Young Children's position statement on
developmentally appropriate practice in the primary grades,
serving 5- through 8-year-olds (1988).
The goal of 5-to-8-year-old programming is to promote
healthy development in children by enhancing life skills (social-
interaction, self-esteem, physical mastery, making choices, and
learning to learn). Therefore, the primary question for Cloverbud
program developers to ask themselves is: does the activity meet
program objectives to promote healthy development as outlined in
the parameters below?
1) Activity based:
Variety of short term experiences.
Cloverbud-aged children have short attention spans,
especially if there are distractions around them (Enns & Akhtar,
1989). The time spent in each activity should be kept at 20
minutes or less to hold their attention.
2) Cooperative-learning centered:
Activities and curriculum are done in small groups as
opposed to doing projects or activities alone.
More than 600 studies have been conducted during the past 90
years comparing the effectiveness of cooperative, competitive,
and individualistic environments with humans of all ages.
Especially in children, it has been clearly proven that
cooperative learning produces higher achievement, social skills
through positive relationships, and healthier psychological
adjustment (self-esteem) than competitive or individualistic
programs (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991).
3) Non-competitive:
Children are engaged in curriculum activities that are
noncompetitive without setting-up categories or classes that
create inequities.
Non-competitive activities and cooperative learning are
directly related to one another. Children have a difficult time
psychologically understanding winning and losing. Feeling and
fact are often merged and when children lose, they relate
negative feelings to their self-worth and identity (Minuchin,
1977). Competition is almost always connected to external awards
and approval. Children in competitive settings, whether they win
or lose, begin to define themselves extrinsically which is a weak
foundation for their developing self-concepts. Children in non-
competitive environments are more likely to develop confidence,
creativity, and competence than do children in competitive
situations (Ames, 1981; Dewey, 1916; Johnson & Johnson, 1989).
4) Fairs are open to participation for Cloverbuds, but for
exhibit only:
Children can exhibit work completed in their Cloverbud clubs
or groups. It is important to make sure that it is non-
competitive and equal recognition is given to all participants.
This does not mean that young children cannot be given advice or
tips on how to improve their exhibit or work.
5) Activities are developmentally age appropriate:
The activity should be designed at their age level (5-to-8-
years-old).
Cloverbud-aged children have limitations in what they can
physically do, mentally understand, emotionally comprehend, and
how they socially interact. These limitations exist because 5-to-
8-year-olds are still developing physically, mentally,
emotionally, and socially. Some brief characteristics of 5-to-8-
year-olds include deficiencies in: body control, eye-hand
coordination, reaction time, endurance, sharing, taking turns,
completing tasks, accepting criticisms, making decisions,
understanding another person's point of view, attention span,
being realistic, and thinking logically (Humphrey & Humphrey,
1989).
6) Activities are safe for children:
Special considerations must be given to ensure the safety of
Cloverbud-aged children.
Many 5-to-8-year-olds are not aware of realistic dangers
surrounding animals, kitchen appliances, and outdoor activities
(bicycle riding, etc.). Children often do not understand adult
instruction, nor the consequences associated with not following
directions (Shutske, 1995). Therefore, Cloverbud activities must
be low risk and safe, even if a child does not participate as
directed.
7) Cloverbud activities are distinctly different from 9-to-19-
year-old activities:
| 4-H Cloverbuds | 4-H 9-to-19-year-old Program |
| Type of Learning | Activity Centered | Project Centered |
| Type of Instruction | Leader Directed | Self-study, Individual,
& Leader Directed |
| Recognition of Standards | Participation | Achievement |
| Recognition of Goals | Participation | Competition, Achievement |
| Learner Resources | Activity Manual | Project Manuals |
8) Curricula are success oriented:
Allow children to gain confidence and promote self-esteem by
mastering Cloverbud activities.
Cooperative and non-competitive settings are ideal for
children to experience success and be more optimistic about
themselves. Self-esteem and optimism are by-products of doing
well and being successful (Seligman, 1995).
9) Animals and animal subject matter should contribute to
Cloverbud objectives and parameters:
Any animal activity should meet the above parameters and
Cloverbud objectives such as promoting self-understanding (self-
esteem) and social-interaction skills. Animals can serve as
excellent subject material for Cloverbud curricula, although
because of safety, liability, and competitive reasons some
restrictions maybe necessary to maintain program objectives.
More specific reasons for being cautious with direct animal
involvement are as follows: (a) children eight and under often
lack the mental and physical skills for controlling and
understanding the strength of large animals (Livestock
Conservation Institute, 1994). Some children between the ages of
5 and 8 lack these abilities to be successful when involved with
animals; (b) working with livestock and animals is the leading
cause of injury in Ohio for children on the farm as compared to
farm machinery, grain silos, etc. (Bean & Wojtowicz, 1993); and
(c) Young children need to have the strength, balance, and
attention span to adequately manage and ride animals (American
Medical Equestrian Assn., 1993).
10) Activity is fun, positive, and focuses on the five general
life skill areas through the experiential learning cycle:
The activity is enjoyable, not tedious. Attention should be
given as to how the activity contributes to the life skills of
self-understanding, social interaction, learning to learn,
physical mastery, and decision making. Life skills are best
attained through the five steps of the experiential learning
cycle (Dewey, 1938): (a) experience - the group engages in some
type of activity or experience; (b) share - the group shares
reactions and observations; (c) process - the group discusses how
questions are brought out by the exercise; (d) generalize - the
group explores common ideas or truths about the experience; and
(e) apply - the group talks about applications of the new
information.
In exploring whether an activity is appropriate and fits
Cloverbud Program philosophies and objectives, ask yourself the
following yes-no questions:
- Is it activity based and short termed?
- Does it involve cooperative learning in which children
work with and not against each other?
- Is it non-competitive and are children equally
recognized?
- If Cloverbud children are involved in a fair, is it for
exhibit only and are they not competitively judged?
- Is the activity safe?
- Is the activity developmentally age appropriate keeping
in mind their physical, social, mental, and emotional
characteristics?
- Is the activity intended for Cloverbud children as
opposed to members in the 9-to-19-year-old program?
- Are the curricula success oriented? Can the children do
the activities successfully?
- Does the animal material contribute to Cloverbud
objectives and parameters?
- Is the activity fun, positive, and focuses on the five
life skill areas through the experiential learning cycle?
If you answered yes to all of the questions then you
probably have an excellent activity to use with the 4-H Cloverbud
Program. If not, explore modifications and discuss them with
other Extension professionals specializing in preadolescent
education or youth development.
References
American Medical Equestrian Association. (1993). When can my
child ride a horse? (Brochure). Waynesville, NC: Author
Ames, C. (1981). Competitive versus cooperative reward
structures: The influence of individual and group performance
factors on achievement attributions and affect. American
Educational Research Journal, 18, 273-87.
Bean, T. L., & Wojtowicz, J. (1993). Farm safety for
children: What parents and grandparents should know. Columbus,
OH: The Ohio State University Extension.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York:
Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York:
Macmillan
Enns, J. T., & Akhtar (1989). A developmental study of
filtering in visual attention. Child Development 60, 1188-1199.
Humphrey, J. N., & Humphrey, J. H. (1989). Child development
during the elementary school years. Springfield, IL: Charles C.
Thomas.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and
competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book
Co.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991).
Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional
productivity. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4).
Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of
Education and Human Development.
Livestock Conservation Institute. (1994). Youth & dairy
cattle: A safe partnership. (Video). Bowling Green, KY: Author
Minuchin, P. (1977). The middle years of childhood.
Monterey, CA: Brooks.
National Association for the Education of Young Children.
(1988). NAEYC position statement on developmentally appropriate
practice in the primary grades, serving 5- through 8-year-olds.
Young Children. 64-84.
National 5-8 Curriculum Task Force. (1991). K-3 youth in 4-
H: Guidelines for programming. Families, 4-H and Nutrition,
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension
Service. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
Seligman, M. E. (1995). The optimistic child. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
Shutske, J. (1995). Is your child protected from injury on
the farm? St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Extension Service.
This article is online at http://www.joe.org/joe/1997august/a2.html.
Copyright ©
by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315.
Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the
Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in
electronic or print form for use in educational or training
activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications,
electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be
done only with prior electronic or written permission of the
Journal Editorial Office,
joe-ed@joe.org.
|