Change in Safe Food Handling Knowledge and
Practices of 4-H Members
Patricia Hammerschmidt
Program Leader
4-H Youth Programs
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan
Internet address: hammersc@msuces.canr.msu.edu
Sandra Andrews
Extension Specialist
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
Michigan State University
and
Chemistry Instructor
Grand Rapids Community College
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Anne Murphy
Nutrition Education Evaluation Consultant
East Lansing, Michigan
June Youatt
Associate Professor
Department of Family and Child Ecology
Michigan State University
Carol Sawyer
Associate Professor
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
Michigan State University
Problem/Need
Foodborne illness affects millions of children each year, but is almost
100% preventable (Centers for Disease Control, 1990). To meet the
instructional needs of volunteer leaders in assisting youth to decrease
their risk of foodborne illness, a curriculum was developed by an
inter-departmental research and outreach team at Michigan State
University. This food safety education program, Operation RISK,
supplies leaders with background information for themselves and
activities for use with youth ages 9 to 11 to teach them the what, whys,
and hows of safe food handling.
This article summarizes the evaluation that was conducted to determine
whether this food safety education program met its objectives to improve
safe food handling knowledge and practices of 4-H members. The
acceptability of the new materials regarding use and perceived
effectiveness was also conducted with members, leaders, and parents and
is reported separately (Hammerschmidt, Murphy, Youatt, Sawyer & Andrews,
1994).
Instructional Materials
Operation RISK uses a detective theme to involve youth in fun-to-solve
cases based on typical food-related situations of 9-11 year olds.
Curriculum components that were pilot tested with 4-H members and
leaders include four lessons, a hypermedia computer game, and two
take-home lessons for use with family members. An audiotape and
videotape, which are components of the Operation RISK curriculum, were
developed after this pilot test project. A leader's guide provides
background information, recommendations for conducting the lesson, and
suggestions for additional activities to extend and support the lessons.
Procedures
Surveys were developed to assess member knowledge about safe food
handling and safe food handling practices of members. The materials are
also suitable for use by teachers in a classroom setting. Operation
RISK, in addition to the 4-H pilot, was tested with 413 fourth grade
students. These surveys were reviewed for content and construct
validity and included in the pilot test materials.
The pilot test materials were mailed to seven leaders who agreed to use
the instructional materials with members (n = 54). The surveys were
administered before and after implementation of the program to determine
the effectiveness of Operation RISK to change safe food handling
knowledge and practices of youth. Procedures for leaders to follow in
administering the surveys and using the materials were included. Two
4-H clubs (23 members) completed the pretest and posttest surveys, but
did not receive any instructions (control group).
Results and Discussion
The demographic data indicated that participating members were primarily
third through fifth graders (mean age = 9.7 years) and included more
girls (n = 60) than boys (n = 17). Most members (80%) took a lunch to
school at least once per week; 40% usually took a lunch from home five
days per week. Of the students that took a lunch to school, 44% packed
a lunch themselves. Although 70% of participants reported they were
with a care provider/parent after school, 85% prepare their own
after-school snack. These findings indicate that youth are involved
with food preparation and, therefore, need to know how and why to safely
pack a lunch or prepare a snack to reduce personal risk of foodborne
illness.
Change in Food Handling Knowledge
The results of the knowledge assessment indicated a need for improvement
in food handling information of members. Before program initiation
(pretest), members were not knowledgeable (mean score of <70%) about:
how or why to wash hands, why cold foods needed to be kept cold, how
foods packed in a lunch could be kept cold, or how to identify unsafe
foods. Posttest survey results showed significant change in the
knowledge of members in all these areas except about why cold foods need
to be kept cold. Statistically significant change was also noted in
areas which members were already knowledgeable about (had high pretest
scores) before participating in Operation RISK. These included
identification of safe foods, why food that falls on the floor is unsafe
to eat unless it is washed, and why a food that might be unsafe to eat
should not be tasted. No significant change in scores on any items, or
for the knowledge survey as a whole, resulted for the control group.
Change in Food Handling Practices
Self-reported practices of members before they received safe food
handling instruction indicated that only about 1/3 washed their hands
"every time" before packing a lunch; 41% washed them each time before
eating at school. Handwashing practices were better at home, yet only
48% reported that they wash hands "every time" before eating at home.
Some change was reported in frequency of washing hands every time before
eating at school (2%) or at home (8%), but no improvement in washing
hands before packing a lunch was reported.
Besides infrequent handwashing, other food handling practices of members
were inconsistent with food safety recommendations: 70% reported not
using a freezer pack every time it is needed, 32% eat leftover foods
from an unrefrigerated lunch, 97% eat unwashed fruit, 40% do not throw
away unsafe food, 30% eat food that has fallen on the floor without
washing it first, and 22% taste food that might be unsafe. Some
positive change resulted in these food handling practices, decreasing
the gap between what students should do and reported doing. For
example, on the posttest, more students reported that they use a freezer
pack in a packed lunch (12% more), never taste a food that might be
unsafe (8% more), never consume leftover meat, eggs, or dairy foods from
an unrefrigerated lunch (6% more), or throw away unsafe food (22% more).
Conclusions and Implications
This research indicates that 4-H members were not knowledgeable about
basic food handling principles (handwashing, how and why to keep food
safe, and how to evaluate the safety of food) before instruction, but
that significant improvement occurred (p<.0001) after participating
in Operation RISK.
Food handling practices of members before involvement in this program
were inappropriate and put them at risk for foodborne illness.
Improvement in many practices was reported following instruction.
However, infrequent handwashing (before packing a lunch, before eating
at school or home) and tasting food that might be unsafe (such as
unrefrigerated food left from lunch, unwashed fruit, and food that fell
on the floor) still were reported to occur and could cause illness.
4-H leaders have the opportunity to help reduce the risk of foodborne
illness in children. First, they can use accurate and "fun" materials
to teach youth how they can ensure their own health by implementing safe
food handling practices within daily eating situations. Second, they
can reinforce information taught by modelling appropriate practices such
as proper handwashing every time before preparing, serving, or eating
food. Additionally, because food preparation and/or consumption is often
a part of the meetings, leaders can provide the opportunity and support
for members to "try out" proper food handling practices learned in the
instructional part of the meeting. In these ways, leaders can join
other health educators to help youth learn and apply safe food handling
recommendations with the potential benefit of reducing the incidence of
foodborne illness in this high-risk population.
References
Centers for Disease Control. (1990). CDC surveillance summaries (Vol.
39, No. SS-1). Atlanta, GA: Author.
Hammerschmidt, P., Murphy, A., Youatt, J., Sawyer, C., & Andrews, S.
(1994, October). Evaluating curriculum effectiveness by asking the users
[7246 bytes]. Journal of Extension [On-line serial], 32(3). Available
E-mail: almanac@joe.org Message: send joe october 1994 ideas 4
Author Notes
Inquiries about this curriculum and surveys can be directed to the first
author. This project received support from the USDA (Special Project
No. 91-ESFQ-1-4009).
This article is online at
http://www.joe.org/joe/1995february/rb2.html.
Copyright ©
by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315.
Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the
Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in
electronic or print form for use in educational or training
activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications,
electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be
done only with prior electronic or written permission of the
Journal Editorial Office,
joe-ed@joe.org.
|