![]() |
December 1994 Volume 32 Number 4 |
Agents Contribute to Statewide Program Designs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table 1. Agents' perceptions of yardwaste compost use by various groups (ranked in order of perceived use). | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uses | Homeowner | Nursery | Local Government | Farmer |
| Mulch | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Soil Amendment | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Lawn Establishment | 4 | 5 | 4 | * |
| Organic Nutrient | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Potting Mix | * | 4 | 5 | * |
| (* not asked of this group) | ||||
Yardwaste compost, when produced on a large scale, is a dark, crumbly material, similar in texture to peat moss. Due to the grinding and screening in processing, it is too fine to be used as a suitable mulch. Most people familiar with backyard leaf composting, where partially decomposed leaves are used as a mulch, assume that yardwaste compost has the same texture and erroneously consider it a mulching material.
Yardwaste compost is also very low in macronutrient content and would not be of much value as a nutrient source. It does, however, contain many of the trace elements or micronutrients. It is also an excellent soil conditioner and can be incorporated into the soil to increase the water holding capacity, increase the cation exchange capacity (CEC), and improve the soil tilth. Some of the agent responses indicate a need to first educate the Extension agents on the properties of, and uses for, yardwaste compost. In response to this observation, in-service training for agents and advanced training for Master Gardeners have addressed the manufacture and use of yardwaste compost.
Compost Facilities
Forty-five percent of the agents responding indicated that their locality would be interested in contracting with a private firm to accept and compost bulk collected leaves and grass clippings for a fee less than the landfill tipping fees. The agents indicated that likely operators of such a facility would be waste management firms, nurseries or landscaping contractors, and biological farmers. Less likely would be greenhouse operators and farm and garden suppliers.
Educational Programs
Programs needed for educating the public on using yardwaste compost were identified through the survey also. Two-thirds of the responding agents indicated the need to educate the public on using compost and local governments on managing yardwaste. Over half of the agents (52%) responded positively to the need for educating the private sector on yardwaste compost technologies and possible business opportunities. Forty-six percent indicated the public should be educated on ways to compost in the backyard. Seventy-five percent of the respondents indicated the most effective educational program or activity would be demonstrations and pilot programs on large-scale composting technology. Thirty-six percent of the agents stated they would like their locality to be considered as a site for a pilot project. Two-thirds indicated that brochures for homeowners would be effective, followed by publications on technologies, presentations to the nursery associations, field days, press releases, and seminars. The least effective methods identified for disseminating information were the most technologically advanced: radio and TV, video tapes, slide sets, and teleconferences.
Comparison of Survey Results
The results from the survey sent to VCE agents were compared to results from a similar survey of Virginia landfill managers, and showed similarities in several of the responses. When asked about methods of disposing of leaves, 70% of the agents and 76% of the landfill managers responded that their locality sent them to the landfill. Seven percent of the agents and 6% of the landfill managers responded that their locality stockpiled the leaves for later use. Only 6% of the landfill managers use some type of public giveaway program for leaves, while 32% of the Extension agents indicated their locality participated in such a program. Eighty-six percent of the landfills allow bulk disposal of grass clippings at their site, while the Extension agents indicated that 88% of their local landfills allowed this.
According to the landfill managers, 34% of the municipalities have established a group to study alternative uses for yardwaste, such as composting, while the agents indicated this number to be 32%. Thirty-one percent of the landfill managers indicated that yardwaste composting was feasible in their locality, while 45% of the Extension agents indicated it was feasible.
The Extension agents are much more optimistic than the landfill managers about the amount of participation in giveaway programs and the feasibility of establishing a yardwaste composting program in their locality. Otherwise, the responses to the survey questions are very similar. This provides one measure of the validity of the survey and the accuracy of data obtained from Extension agents in assessing conditions in their communities.
Conclusion and Recommendations
As in other states, VCE is becoming a major source of information for educating the public, as well as large scale operations, on producing and using backyard compost. The agents' responses to the survey were instrumental in developing educational programming to address yardwaste. This educational programming has included the following actions.
Agents have a sound knowledge of the needs and potential for their community in yardwaste management and an understanding of what educational programs are effective in producing change. They are an excellent resource for collecting information for projecting needs and planning action. Surveys designed to collect adequate information and agent recommendations are a useful tool in program planning.
References
May, J. H., & Simpson, T. W. (1990). The Virginia yardwaste management manual. (Cooperative Extension Publication No. 452-055). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Simpson, T. W., & May, J. H. (1990). The feasibility of a yardwaste composting program for Virginia (House Document No. 34). Richmond: Virginia General Assembly.
This article is online at http://www.joe.org/joe/1994december/a4.html.
Copyright © by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315. Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in electronic or print form for use in educational or training activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications, electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be done only with prior electronic or written permission of the Journal Editorial Office, joe-ed@joe.org.