![]() |
Winter 1991 Volume 29 Number 4 |
Targeting Audiences for the 21st Century
Soneeta Grogan By the year 2010, one-quarter to one-third of all Americans will belong to racial or ethnic minority groups.1 Additionally, more than one-third of children living in the U.S. will be black, Hispanic, or Asian.2 If current trends continue, a significant proportion of these individuals will have low incomes. Even those with middle incomes and greater resources will have different characteristics than Extension's traditional white, middle-income audience. Citizens from these racial and ethnic minority groups will have varying histories, customs, values, and sensitivities. How well is Extension reaching minorities? The data show it has been increasing its contact with minority clientele. Over the fiscal 1984-86 period, Extension's total contacts with minority clientele increased slightly from 15.6% to 16.3%. For the same period, total contacts with majority clientele decreased from 84.4% to 83.8%.3 In fiscal 1986, contacts with minority clientele accounted for 33% of a 46.5 million minority clientele potential. For the same period, contacts with majority clientele accounted for 38% of the 206.1 million majority potential.4 Although contacts with minority clientele have increased, the percentage of contacts with this population relative to the potential continues to be lower than for majority clientele. The next century also promises a larger proportion of low- income citizens. Many of these citizens will constitute the limited-resource audience that includes "individuals and families who lack access to adequate nutrition, affordable health care, transportation alternatives, stable home environments, and quality housing because of limited income and education."5 These individuals and families will struggle to provide for the necessities of life. Adults and youth from this audience will need a variety of life skills to effectively manage with limited resources. Extension and Equity While Extension's traditional white, middle-class audience shouldn't be neglected, greater participation by members of these other audiences should be an Extension priority. Equity demands that all groups participate in and benefit from Extension programs. In addition, in some localities, Extension may not have a clientele if programs aren't designed to attract and involve these nontraditional audiences.6 As Extension staff, we must increase our knowledge and skills for working with low-income and minority populations. Each staff person can benefit from learning about other racial or ethnic groups. Staff who have never been low-income or were a long time ago can benefit from learning about the low-income experience-a prerequisite to developing programs relevant to nontraditional audiences. Approaches for Administrators To meet the challenge of reaching and educating these audiences, here are several approaches for Extension administrators and other Extension staff:
In the first part of her article on hunger and malnutrition, Fitchen says they do indeed exist in the U.S.9 The last part of the article focuses on how the food and eating patterns of the poor are shaped by dominant American cultural ideas and practices. Most important, she discusses common attitudes about poverty and the poor and how those attitudes demonstrate a lack of awareness of the cultural aspects of eating and living in the U.S. She submits that, like all of us, the low- income are American by culture and thus have the same desires as other Americans.
Approaches for All Staff The following are approaches for all staff:
The Future Challenge During its history, Extension has successfully met numerous challenges. Many Extension staff have the ability to develop skills and sensitivities needed to educate low-income and minority audiences. What's needed now is an active commitment to this objective by more Extension staff-not just those who have always educated these audiences. The future success of Extension will be determined not only by the relevance of its educational programs, but by the extent to which low-income and minority group citizens participate in and consider them valuable. Footnotes 1. J. P. Allen and E. Turner, "Diversity Reigns," American Demographics, XII (August 1990), 34-38. 2. J. Schwartz and T. Exter, "All Our Children," American Demographics, XI (May 1989), 34-37. 3. Louise P. Ashton, A Resource Directory of Actual Clientele Contacts in the Cooperative Extension Service, Fiscal Years 1984 to 1986 with Fiscal Year 1987 Planned (Washington, D.C.: Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture, June 1987). 4. Ibid. 5. Jane Schuchardt, ed., "Reaching Limited Resource Audiences," Family Economics Newsletter (Washington, D.C.: Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture, December 1990/January 1991), pp. 1-2. 6. W. A. Henry III, "Beyond the Melting Pot," Time, CXXXV (April 9, 1990), 28-31. 7. J. Ross-Gordon, L. Martin, and D. Buck Briscoe, Serving Culturally Diverse Populations (San Francisco, California: Jossey -Bass, 1990). 8. Janet M. Fitchen, Poverty in Rural America: A Case Study (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1981). 9. Janet M. Fitchen, "Hunger, Malnutrition, and Poverty in the Contemporary United States: Some Observations on Their Social and Cultural Context," Food and Foodways, II (No. 3, 1988), 309-33. 10. Ross-Gordon, Martin, and Briscoe, Serving Culturally Diverse Populations.
This article is online at http://www.joe.org/joe/1991winter/fut1.html.
Copyright © by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315. Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in electronic or print form for use in educational or training activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications, electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be done only with prior electronic or written permission of the Journal Editorial Office, joe-ed@joe.org. |