|
Not Quick and Dirty,
But Simple and Clean
Thomas Michael Archer
County Extension Agent, 4-H, Shelby County
Ohio Cooperative Extension Service
Ohio State University-Sidney
Let's face it-"evaluation" is still a dirty word when it comes to busy
Extension professionals. Educators are more interested in helping
clientele solve problems than doing evaluations, with all the time it
takes.
Time is the key word. Where can an Extension professional find time to
produce a data collection instrument that will improve teaching and
programming? The answer lies in keeping our eyes open for "quick and
dirty" evaluation instruments and approaches, while at the same time
completing the daily job duties. Most of us aren't above stealing an
idea (if it works), even if it's in evaluation!
One workable idea making limited rounds in Extension circles is the
"Evaluation Card" (see Figure 1). This card is designed to measure three
aspects of each presentation: knowledge gained, quality of presentation,
and usefulness of information.
Figure 1. Evaluation card.
It's simple to use. At the end of a workshop, 3 x 5 cards are given to
participants, with these instructions:
To evaluate this workshop and to plan for future workshops, we need your
help. Please take one of these 3 x 5 index cards and circle the
numerical score that you wish to give the categories along the three
edges: knowledge gained, quality of presentation, and usefulness of
information. Remember, one is the lowest (poorest) score, and five is
the highest (best).
Then, on the blank side of the card, answer the following question in as
many words or phrases that you wish: "What was your reaction(s) to this
workshop?"
Be sure to label the center of the front of the card with the name of
the presenter and the date. We'll gather these cards as you leave.
In a few minutes, the program presenter has a numerical measure on the
amount and potential use of perceived information transferred, as well
as a score on the methods of presentation. Just as much information (if
not more) is provided through the written comments, so strongly
encourage these.
Very quickly, both quantitative and qualitative data can be collected.
By arranging the cards so that all "black corners" are aligned, a simple
ripple of the "deck" on each of the three edges provides instant
feedback. Key elements for improvement can also be received by looking
at the written comments-an evaluation with numbers and comments. It's
simple and clean!
Footnote
1. L. Faulkner and A. Williams, The FCL Evaluation Card (Bozeman:
Montana State University, Center for Data Systems and Analysis, 1981).
This article is online at
http://www.joe.org/joe/1991fall/iw4.html.
Copyright ©
by Extension Journal, Inc. ISSN 1077-5315.
Articles appearing in the Journal become the property of the
Journal. Single copies of articles may be reproduced in
electronic or print form for use in educational or training
activities. Inclusion of articles in other publications,
electronic sources, or systematic large-scale distribution may be
done only with prior electronic or written permission of the
Journal Editorial Office,
joe-ed@joe.org.
|